Why Victoria Nuland Should Not Be Missed

In the 60 minute news cycle that has become the world in which we find ourselves living today, it’s easy to get distracted from developments that could lead to far greater adverse consequences than most Americans yet fully realize … much less, completely appreciate.

To be sure, the invasion at our border, the corruption of both our government institutions and schools, the decay of our nation’s morality, the impending bankruptcy of our country due to a soaring national debt and the uncertainty surrounding our upcoming election this November are all most certainly important matters deserving of our attention.

But, at the end of the day, will any of these issues really matter very much if WWIII erupts beyond our control into a realm that could very well quickly become nuclear?

That is why our attention now is better directed at doing anything we can to avoid the Biden Administration’s further corrosion of what remains of our fragile relationship with the Russian people. That is, if we may still want to have any hope of averting our mutual destruction.

Whatever anyone here in America may think of Putin, about one thing we can probably all agree: he is not a man known for bending a knee to his adversaries  … which is putting it mildly.

So, when he says that all the perpetrators identified to be involved in last week’s terrorist attack in Moscow will be punished … we must assume he means it. Which, of course, should leave any reasonable person to ask: who is it exactly that Putin is likely to blame for the massacre and how exactly does he intend to punish them?

To address the first of these two issues the American people are urged to listen to the following video of Victoria Nuland excerpted from a speech she gave at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) concurrently with her resignation from the State Department … but, more importantly, just days before the terrorist attack last week at the Crocus City Hall in Moscow.  

[Especially important — so far as Putin and perhaps other in his government may be concerned — is the part where she smugly advises her audience with a smirk on her face that America’s funding of Ukraine will — to her evident glee —accelerate “asymmetric warfare” that will ensure that Putin faces some ‘nasty surprises’ on the battle field this year.”]